Ford Pinto engine: Information From Answers.com
The Ford Pinto engine is the unofficial but ubiquitous nickname for a 4 cylinder internal combustion engine built by the Ford Motor Company in Europe. In Ford sales literature it was referred to as the EAO or OHC engine, it is also sometimes called the Metric engine since it was designed using the metric system.
Smolinski and Blake
Henry Smolinski and Hal Blake founded Advanced Vehicle Engineers in Van Nuys, California. Their gimmick: put flight instruments and controls in a 1971 Ford Pinto. Saw the cabin and front engine off a twin-boom Cessna Skymaster, and attach the rest of the aircraft to the rear of the Pinto with the wings over the roof and the pusher engine snugged up against the hatchback. Fly the Pinto to an airport near your destination, unlatch it from the wings, and drive it where you want to go.
Pam's House Blend
Safety was not a major concern to Ford at the time of the development of the Pinto. Lee Iacocca, who was in charge of the development of the Pinto, had specifications for the design of the car that were uncompromisable. The rush of the Pinto from conception to production was a recipe for disaster. Many studies have been concluded by Mother Jones on Pinto accident reports which have revealed conclusively that if a Pinto being followed at over 30 miles per hour was hit by that following vehicle, the rear end of the car would buckle like an accordion, right up to the back seat. The tube leading to the gas-tank cap would be ripped away from the tank itself, and gas would immediately begin sloshing onto the road around the car. The buckled gas tank would be jammed up against the differential housing (the large bulge in the middle of the rear axle), which contains four sharp, protruding bolts likely to gash holes in the tank and spill still more gas. Now all that is needed is a spark from a cigarette, ignition, or scraping metal, and both cars would be engulfed in flames.
COMP 601/CAAM 601: Research Ethics Seminar
In the early 1970's when competition from Japan's auto makers was heating up, gas prics were easing, the demands for energy conservation were just around the corner (awaiting the Arab oil boycotts that arrived first in 1973-74), Ford Motor Company with Lee Iacocca as its president, introduced a new line of cars, the Ford Pinto. During crash tests which preceded the introduction of the Pinto to the public, it became apparent that the vehicle had a dangerous design flaw. The gas tank was so designed and located that when it was involved in a rear end collision at an impact speed of 20mph or higher, the tank was apt to rupture, causing a fire or explosion. The tank was only five inches forward of the rear sheet metal of the body and only three inches back of the rear axle housing. In not just one, but most of the rear-end crash tests, the axle housing deformed the tank and sharp, protruding bolts punctured the tank. Much of the information for this case is extracted from Reckless Homocide: Ford's Pinto Trial by Lee Patrick Strobel, published in 1980 by And Brooks. Strobel is legal affairs editor for the Chicato Tribune.
A Small Victory: Kerry's Exploding Fuel Tank
Not only was the Camp Kerry Pinto traveling far off course when Allawi came to town (it was on Ohio), but Kerry comes out and all but calls Allawi a liar. Ponder this: the man who wants to be President of the United States could not be bothered to meet up with the man who will play a vital role in a vital part of foreign affairs for the next few years. And then, he disses him. Back to the car metaphor, it seems as if the Little Pinto That Couldn't is purposely steering into these potholes. Rather than drive around them or find another route, they keep chugging along like extreme drivers looking for a challenge.
Business Horizons: The impact of negative product news
Six years later more than 2 million Pintos had been sold, making the subcompact one of Ford's best-selling cars. However, the popular Pinto was plagued by public criticism concerning its fuel tank design. The fuel tank was located only seven inches from the car's bumper, making it susceptible to leakage and fires upon collision. The impact of this negative publicity can be traced by looking at the change in Pinto's share of the subcompact market from 1977 to 1980. An August 1977 Mother Jones article stimulated the general public's awareness of the Pinto's potential fire hazard, a charge that Ford publicly denied. Ford did try to mitigate the detrimental influence of the negative publicity by changing the focus of its advertising campaign. Louis Latif, Ford division general marketing manager, acknowledged that Ford viewed the bad publicity as totally unwarranted and blown out of proportion. The company's new advertising strategy was implemented in October 1978, following the indictment by the state of Indiana. Standard equipment was added to the Pinto, which was attractively priced compared with the competition. Incentives were offered.
Barnes & Noble.com - The Ford Pinto Case: A Study in Applied ...
This book bring together the basic documents needed for reaching an informed judgment on the central ethical question in the Pinto case: did Ford Motor Company act ethically in designing the Pinto fuel system and in deciding not to upgrade the integrity of that system until 1978? Brings together the basic documents needed for reaching an informed judgment on the central ethical question in the Pinto case: did Ford Motor Company act ethically in designing the Pinto fuel system and in deciding not to upgrade the integrity of that system until 1978? The five parts of the volume cover the case, cost-benefit analysis, whistle blowing, product liability, and government regulations. Annotation c.
Used Ford Pinto Prices Used Ford Pinto Car Retail Pricing ...
Learn the true used Ford Pinto price of any model. Search for used Ford Pinto pricing by year, make, class, type, and more. Calculate the used Ford Pinto car retail price after factoring in mileage and vehicle condition. Also contrast the used car retail price with the used Ford Pinto trade-in value for a guiding estimate of bargaining room. Researching the used Ford Pinto car price of a vehicle and all of the details can save you thousands of dollars when buying a used car.
Ford Pinto
Ford Pinto "The Ford Pinto case is mentioned in most Business Ethics texts as an example of Cost-Benefit analysis, yet in those formats any appreciation of the complexity surrounding the issues of such decisions is overly simplified. In pre-production planning, engineers seriously considered using in the Pinto the same kind of gas tank Ford uses in the Capri. The Capri tank rides over the rear axle and differential housing. It has been so successful in over 50 crash tests that Ford used it in its Experimental Safety Vehicle, which withstood rear-end impacts of 60 mph. So why wasn't the Capri tank used in the Pinto? President Semon "Bunky" Knudsen, whom Henry Ford II had hired away from General Motors, and Lee Iacocca, a spunky Young Turk who had risen fast within the company on the enormous success of the Mustang. Iacocca saying was that the Japanese were going to capture the entire American subcompact market unless Ford put out its own alternative to the VW Beetle. Bunky Knudsen said let them have the small-car market, but he lost the battle and later resigned.
All about Criminal Motivation, by Mark Gado
In 1970, the Ford Pinto scandal rocked the business world and exposed the type of motivation behind white-collar crime. The Ford Pinto was designed quickly by the Ford Motor Company to compete with European cars that were grabbing a larger share of the American dollar. However, the basic design of the vehicle exposed the gas tank to a greater risk of explosion in the event of a rear end impact. Over the next few years, dozens of people were killed when the Pinto gas tanks exploded in fiery crashes. At a sensational trial in 1974, Ford executives explained their decision to leave the gas tank design as is by offering a cost benefit analysis (CBA) which showed that it was much too expensive to retool the car, even though it might have saved lives. The total savings for each vehicle was estimated to be $11.
We are not an official site of ford. We are just adepts of ford religion. We own ford cars, we drive ford cars, we want to read about ford cars and finally we want to tell you what news we found about our cars. All trademarks you can find on this site are belong to their respective owners. ford is trademark of Ford Motor Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. You can find official ford information at official web site.
© Copyright 2005. Info About Ford